Vanessa Steinroetter posted my essay from Digital Humanities Quarterly "Edition, Project, Database, Thematic Research Collection: What's in a Name?" in the "About the Archive" section of the site.
--Ken
Saturday, February 27, 2010
Friday, January 22, 2010
Thursday, January 21, 2010
Error corrected in periodical printing of "Beat! Beat! Drums!"
I've corrected a typographical error in our transcription of the periodical printing of "Beat! Beat! Drums!" In the second stanza, I've corrected "Over the traffic of cites" to read "Over the traffic of cities."
--Liz
--Liz
Thursday, December 17, 2009
editorial policy statement revised
I have revised a paragraph of the editorial policy statement relating to correspondence. The paragraph which previously read, "Those letters for which the Archive has digital images have been freshly transcribed and edited, often for the first time. For now, we follow the practices of other editors of correspondence by remaining as unobtrusive as possible and presenting an inclusive text representing as nearly as possible a clean, reading version of the letter. We have not recorded deletions, noted authors' insertions, or attempted to duplicate the appearance of the original holographs. We have omitted letterheads and standardized the placement of salutations, signatures, and postscripts. These decisions have been made on a pragmatic basis and to create consistency among the materials presented. As we secure more digital images of original letters, and as we have time, we will update our XML files and encode all deletions and insertions. In the future, Archive users will have an opportunity to choose between two different ways of viewing the correspondence, either as clean, reading versions or as diplomatic transcriptions," now includes a sentence explaining our treatment of meta-commentary, "Those letters for which the Archive has digital images have been freshly transcribed and edited, often for the first time. For now, we follow the practices of other editors of correspondence by remaining as unobtrusive as possible and presenting an inclusive text representing as nearly as possible a clean, reading version of the letter. We have not recorded deletions, noted authors' insertions, nor attempted to duplicate the appearance of the original holographs. We have also omitted metacommentary in the form of cues such as "(over)" that were relevant to the reader of the original letter as a physical object but are more distracting than helpful in an electronic environment. We have omitted letterheads and standardized the placement of salutations, signatures, and postscripts. These decisions have been made on a pragmatic basis and to create consistency among the materials presented. As we secure more digital images of original letters, and as we have time, we will update our XML files and encode all deletions and insertions. In the future, Archive users will have an opportunity to choose between two different ways of viewing the correspondence, either as clean, reading versions or as diplomatic transcriptions."
~Liz
~Liz
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
Editorial Policy Statement Revised
I have fixed two errors in the Editorial Policy Statement: I have changed "restraints" in the first paragraph to "constraints" and have replaced an en-dash in the Translations section with an em-dash.
Also, I have folded the longer correspondence editorial policy statement into the correspondence section so that the information now exists in a single location.
~Liz
Also, I have folded the longer correspondence editorial policy statement into the correspondence section so that the information now exists in a single location.
~Liz
Spanish version of "Spanish Editions" Intro Page Posted
The Spanish Editions intro/index page, http://www.whitmanarchive.org/published/foreign/spanish/index.html, now allows users to click through to a Spanish version of the page (a feature we recently adopted for the German editions). Matt Cohen translated the index page and provided the xhtml file.
~Liz
~Liz
Thursday, November 12, 2009
broken link fixed
The link to Ed Folsom's "Reply" (http://www.whitmanarchive.org/about/articles/anc.00143.html) from within "Database as Genre: The Epic Transformation of Archives" (http://www.whitmanarchive.org/about/articles/anc.00142.html) was pointing to the wrong file. I've fixed the link.
~Liz
~Liz
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)